Why Ukraine Rejects Russia’s Ceasefire Terms in Istanbul

Istanbul, May 17, 2025 – The air in Istanbul’s Dolmabahce Palace was thick with tension on May 16, 2025, as Ukraine and Russia sat down for their first direct talks since March 2022. Hopes for a ceasefire in the brutal war, now in its fourth year, flickered briefly. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered a resounding “no deal” to Russia’s terms, calling them “non-starters.” With the world watching, the talks collapsed, leaving the conflict’s death toll—over 500,000 combined casualties, per UN estimates—poised to climb. Why did Ukraine walk away? And what does this mean for a world teetering on the edge of escalation?

A Fleeting Hope in Istanbul

The talks, mediated by Turkey, were a rare moment of diplomacy in a war marked by relentless violence. Ukraine’s delegation, led by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, arrived with clear goals: secure a prisoner swap and push for an immediate 30-day ceasefire. Russia, represented by Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky, signaled openness to dialogue but clung to maximalist demands, including territorial concessions and limits on Ukrainian sovereignty, according to The Guardian.

By 3 p.m. local time on May 16, the talks had unraveled. Ukraine’s foreign ministry spokesperson told reporters Russia’s conditions were “unacceptable,” echoing Zelenskyy’s stance that any deal must include a “full, unconditional, and honest ceasefire.” The only tangible outcome was an agreement to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war each—the largest swap in the conflict’s history. But with no ceasefire in sight, the prisoner deal felt like a footnote in a larger failure.

Zelenskyy’s Defiance: “Not Serious Enough”

Zelenskyy, speaking from Tirana, Albania, on May 16, didn’t mince words. He accused Russia of sending a “decorative” delegation, led by mid-level officials with no real decision-making power. “The level of the Russian delegation… looks like a sham,” he said, per NBC News. He challenged Russian President Vladimir Putin to attend talks personally, a bold move given Putin’s absence and the Kremlin’s insistence on terms Kyiv deems surrender.

Ukraine’s rejection stems from Russia’s demands, which include ceding occupied territories—roughly 18% of Ukraine, per Reuters—and restricting its military capabilities. Kyiv views these as an assault on its sovereignty. “If Russia cannot agree to a ceasefire, it’s clear Putin continues to undermine diplomacy,” Zelenskyy said, addressing European leaders.

The Human Cost: A War Without Pause

The stakes couldn’t be higher. As of May 17, 2025, the UN reports over 10,000 civilian deaths and 20,000 injuries in Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in February 2022. Military casualties are staggering, with estimates of 200,000 Russian and 100,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed or wounded. Just hours after the Istanbul talks collapsed, a Russian strike on a bus in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region killed nine civilians, underscoring the war’s unrelenting toll, per The Independent.

Witnesses in Kharkiv described scenes of chaos. “The explosion was deafening. People were screaming, running for cover,” one resident told BBC Breaking. Ukraine’s air defenses, stretched thin, intercepted only 10 of 100 Russian drones launched overnight on May 15, per PBS News. The failure to secure a ceasefire means more nights like this for Ukrainians.

Global Pressure and Trump’s Shadow

The Istanbul talks were heavily influenced by U.S. President Donald Trump, who has pushed for a swift resolution since taking office in January 2025. Trump publicly urged Zelenskyy to accept Russia’s offer for talks, posting on Truth Social: “Have the meeting, now!” But his optimism clashed with reality. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, set to meet European counterparts in Istanbul on May 17, called a Trump-Putin meeting “the only way” for a breakthrough.

European leaders, meanwhile, are furious. Britain, France, Germany, and Poland demanded a 30-day ceasefire before talks, threatening sanctions if Russia refused. Moscow’s rejection prompted UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to warn of “ramped-up sanctions and military aid” for Ukraine. The EU’s Kaja Kallas stressed, “To start peace talks, there must be a ceasefire.”

Russia’s Calculus: Power Over Peace?

Russia’s stance reflects Putin’s long-game strategy. The Kremlin insists on addressing “root causes”—a euphemism for demands like Ukraine’s demilitarization and recognition of annexed territories. Putin’s absence from Istanbul, opting for a junior delegation, was seen as a snub. “Putin doesn’t want genuine peace talks unless it’s on his terms,” said Boris Bondarev, a former Russian diplomat, per The Guardian.

Moscow’s battlefield gains fuel its hardline position. Russian forces control key areas in Donetsk and Kursk, with 133 clashes reported on May 13 alone, per Al Jazeera. Putin fears a ceasefire would allow Ukraine to rearm, a concern echoed by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

Turkey’s Role: Neutral Ground or Power Play?

Turkey, hosting the talks, walked a diplomatic tightrope. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met Zelenskyy in Ankara on May 15, reaffirming support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Yet Turkey maintains ties with Russia, relying on its energy exports. Al Jazeera reported Erdogan’s team worked tirelessly to salvage the talks, but low expectations prevailed. “Turkey can’t force a deal, but it’s a stage for global powers to flex,” said political scientist Helin Sari Ertem.

What It Means Now

The collapse of the Istanbul talks signals a dangerous stalemate. Ukraine’s rejection of Russia’s terms preserves its sovereignty but risks prolonged conflict. The prisoner swap, while significant, does little to halt the violence. With 1,000 POWs returning home on each side, families will reunite, but the war’s broader toll—displaced millions, shattered cities—remains unaddressed.

For Zelenskyy, the talks were a diplomatic gamble. By engaging, he showed willingness to negotiate, countering Trump’s reported frustration with Kyiv. But rejecting Russia’s terms strengthens his domestic support, with 68% of Ukrainians opposing territorial concessions, per a Kyiv International Institute of Sociology poll.

Globally, the failure heightens tensions. NATO allies, already supplying Ukraine with $40 billion in aid annually, face pressure to escalate support. Russia, hit with over 14,000 sanctions since 2022, may face more, potentially targeting its energy sector. Trump’s push for a quick deal could falter, straining U.S.-Europe relations.

The immediate impact is clear: no ceasefire, no pause in the bloodshed. Ukraine’s air defenses will face more Russian drones, and civilians will endure more strikes. The UN warns of a looming humanitarian crisis as winter approaches, with 3.6 million Ukrainians internally displaced.

The Road Ahead: Ceasefire or Escalation?

Zelenskyy’s call for a Zelenskyy-Putin meeting remains unanswered. The Kremlin’s silence suggests Putin Điện thoại biding his time, betting on battlefield gains over diplomacy. Ukraine, backed by Western allies, shows no sign of bending. “We want peace, but not surrender,” Umerov told reporters post-talks.

The war’s trajectory hinges on global players. Trump’s next move—whether to pressure Putin or pivot away from Ukraine—will shape the conflict. Europe’s sanctions threat looms, but enforcement is tricky amid energy dependencies. Turkey’s mediation role may grow, but its influence is limited without U.S. or Russian buy-in.

For now, the front lines burn. In Donetsk, Ukrainian commander Oleksandr Syrskyi reported “heavy fighting” on May 16, with Russian forces advancing. The Istanbul talks, meant to be a turning point, have instead exposed the chasm between Kyiv and Moscow.

Stay sharp with Ongoing Now 24.